Most of the committee's work is done by people who are not members. The tracks below differ in what they commit you to, not in how seriously the work is taken.
Member
Full participation in one or more workstreams, a vote on committee findings, and the standing to publish dissent when you disagree with one. Members serve as individuals rather than as representatives of an employer.
- Commitment
- Roughly four hours a month, plus two longer sessions a year
- Who it suits
- Researchers, engineers, regulators, policy specialists, and people from the energy and water sectors whose infrastructure this depends on.
Contributor
Work on a specific output without joining the committee. Most of what the committee produces is built this way: a measurement method needs people who have actually metered a facility, and a deployment standard needs people who have shipped one.
- Commitment
- Whatever the piece of work takes
- Who it suits
- Anyone who can do the work. No affiliation required.
Reviewer
Read drafts before publication and say where they are wrong. This is the least glamorous track and probably the most useful one, since the committee's credibility rests on its outputs surviving people who were not involved in writing them.
- Commitment
- A few hours per draft, a handful of times a year
- Who it suits
- People with relevant expertise and no obligation to be polite about it.